Connect study milestones, site activity, and operational queries
A RUSA case study for healthcare and life sciences teams, connecting study milestones, site activation logs, enrollment counts, visit schedules, and data query events for clinical research site operations.
Site activation completed within plan (%)
Enrollment against approved plan (%)
Scheduled visit completion rate (%)
Median data query closure time (days)
THE CHALLENGE
Research operations reports separate site readiness from enrollment and query backlog
Unrecorded demand
Unfulfilled requests are absent from booking reports.
Roster changes
Available slots change without retained history.
Mixed attendance
Cancellations and no-shows share the same status.
Unfair comparison
Specialties with different consultation needs are ranked together.
THE SOLUTION
Clinical Research Site Operations Review Framework
Milestone versions
Connect requested, offered, booked, and attended dates.
Slot inventory
Retain effective provider and facility capacity.
Attendance taxonomy
Separate attendance, cancellations, and unnotified absence.
Specialty comparison
Review access using comparable services and booking rules.
THE APPROACH
Study Baseline Milestone Versioning
Retain fulfilled and unfulfilled appointment requests with requested specialty and first contact date.
Provider Slot History
Version available appointment capacity using effective rosters, protected slots, and authorized schedule changes.
Request Booking Linkage
Connect requested, offered, booked, rescheduled, cancelled, and attended events.
Attendance Status Harmonization
Compare scheduled visit records with documented completion, rescheduling, and missed-visit states.
Research Query Lifecycle Tracking
Connect raised, answered, reviewed, reopened, and closed data queries with assigned reviewers.
Site Operations Exception Review
Review milestone delays and aged queries using de-identified data without evaluating efficacy, eligibility, or study safety.
THE IMPACT
Readiness visibility
Operations could review activation bottlenecks by site.
Plan context
Enrollment could be compared with the relevant approved plan.
Visit accountability
Missing operational visit records could receive follow-up.
Query ownership
Open questions could show their responsible reviewer and age.
Controlled review
Authorized teams could review delayed site milestones, missing visit records, and aged data queries, with source evidence retained beside the review case.
Measurable evaluation
A pilot could establish baseline values for site activation completed within plan (%) and assess changes after approved actions. The concept would not evaluate clinical efficacy, participant eligibility, or study safety.
Explore Healthcare Appointment Access
Work with RUSA Analytics to connect appointment requests, booking events, provider rosters, attendance, and cancellations and create a governed workflow to review unfulfilled requests, idle appointment slots, and repeated late cancellations. Start with a scoped concept or pilot and agreed success measures.
MORE WORK
Explore other case studies