Connect deposit movement to branch service and funding context
A RUSA case study for banking, financial services and insurance teams, connecting deposit balances, account movements, interest costs, branch references, and service cases for banking deposit and branch performance.
Net deposit inflow
Average deposit balance
Deposit funding cost (%)
Branch service resolution within target (%)
THE CHALLENGE
Branch rankings mix deposit balances, flows, and service quality
Incomplete stages
Applications lack reliable milestone timestamps.
Document loops
Repeated requests are not connected to checklist status.
Mixed products
Different lending processes share one turnaround benchmark.
Decision opacity
Workflow reporting is confused with credit eligibility scoring.
THE SOLUTION
Banking Deposit And Branch Performance Review Framework
Flow decomposition
Connect submitted, checked, reviewed, and decided events.
Document status
Track missing items and repeated requests against a checklist.
Product targets
Apply distinct review commitments by lending product.
Human decision trail
Preserve authorized decisions and recorded reasons.
THE APPROACH
Deposit Movement Classification
Map product-specific submission, document review, underwriting, and decision milestones with approved service clocks.
Document Checklist Reconciliation
Connect received evidence to required checklist items and distinguish submission from accepted documentation.
Resubmission History Linking
Retain repeated requests and application versions so rework does not reset the underlying service history.
Stage Ageing Calculation
Match accrued deposit interest with the eligible average balance and relevant reporting period.
Deposit Service Context
Connect unresolved deposit cases with branch reporting without exposing unnecessary customer information.
Branch Portfolio Comparison
Review flows, funding cost, and service outcomes across comparable product mixes rather than unadjusted balance rankings.
THE IMPACT
Growth clarity
Teams could distinguish new funds from internal movements.
Comparable branches
Product mix could be included in performance review.
Funding visibility
Interest cost could be traced to relevant balances.
Service follow-up
Deposit-related cases could receive coordinated branch attention.
Controlled review
Authorized teams could review external outflows, unexplained transfers, and overdue deposit cases, with source evidence retained beside the review case.
Measurable evaluation
A pilot could establish baseline values for net deposit inflow and assess changes after approved actions. Branch comparison would not establish individual staff performance without workload and portfolio context.
Explore Banking Loan Application Workflow
Work with RUSA Analytics to connect loan applications, document checklists, underwriting milestones, and decision logs and create a governed workflow to review overdue stages, repeated document requests, and withdrawn applications. Start with a scoped concept or pilot and agreed success measures.
MORE WORK
Explore other case studies